Impaired colleague: mandatory notification to Ahpra

Impaired colleague: mandatory notification to Ahpra

By Dr. Shannon KendrickUpdated September 2026

The case

During a night shift, a surgical registrar notices that a colleague, a visiting fellow, is slurring his speech, has an unsteady gait and smells of alcohol while preparing for an emergency laparotomy. The fellow refuses the suggestion of a breathalyser test. Two hours earlier, similar impairment led to a near-miss airway complication. Patient safety is at immediate risk. What is the most appropriate action under Australian regulatory frameworks?

Options

  1. AMake a mandatory notification to Ahpra for impairment (after removing him from the case)
  2. BDocument the concern at handover for the day team to review
  3. CConfront him privately and allow him to stand himself down
  4. DNotify the hospital executive and the police
  5. EAsk the anaesthetic supervisor to remove him from the case, and take no further action

Think it through before you read on. Which single option is best, and why are the other four wrong?

Show the answer and explanation

Answer

A. Make a mandatory notification to Ahpra for impairment (after removing him from the case)

Why this is the right answer

Two duties arise at once here, and both must be met. The first is immediate patient safety: an apparently intoxicated surgeon must not operate. The registrar should escalate to the senior surgeon on call, the anaesthetist and the hospital's medical administrator or duty executive so that the fellow is stood down and the operation proceeds with a fit surgeon.

The second duty is regulatory. Under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, every registered health practitioner must make a mandatory notification to Ahpra if they form a reasonable belief that another practitioner has engaged in 'notifiable conduct'. The four categories are practising while intoxicated by alcohol or drugs, sexual misconduct in practice, placing the public at risk of substantial harm because of an impairment, and placing the public at risk by a significant departure from accepted standards.

This situation meets the threshold. There are direct observations of intoxication (slurred speech, ataxia, smell of alcohol), the fellow is about to practise, and there has already been a near miss. Ahpra's guidelines on mandatory notifications (2020) explain that the notification must be made as soon as practicable, that the notifier is protected from civil, criminal and administrative liability when acting in good faith, and that the employer also has a separate mandatory notification duty.

Handling it informally, or leaving it for the day team, does not satisfy the law and leaves patients exposed. Police involvement is not the regulatory pathway and is not required for practising while intoxicated, although hospital security may be needed if the fellow will not stand down.

The fellow's welfare matters too. Impairment from alcohol is a health problem, and Ahpra's health program and the doctors' health advisory services in each state exist to support practitioners into treatment.

Why the other options are wrong

B

Deferring to the morning leaves an impaired surgeon operating tonight and breaches the mandatory notification duty.

C

Self-assessment by an intoxicated practitioner is unsafe, and a near miss has already occurred.

D

Executive notification is appropriate, but police are not the pathway; the legal obligation is notification to Ahpra.

E

Removing him from the case is essential and comes first, but the National Law also requires notification to Ahpra.

High-yield takeaway

Practising while intoxicated is notifiable conduct: stand the practitioner down immediately and make a mandatory notification to Ahpra; good-faith notifiers are legally protected.

Reference: Ahpra and National Boards: Guidelines for Mandatory Notifications (Health Practitioner Regulation National Law) (2020)

Common questions

What are the four types of notifiable conduct?

Practising while intoxicated, sexual misconduct in practice, an impairment that places the public at risk of substantial harm, and a significant departure from accepted professional standards.

Is the person who makes a notification protected?

Yes. A practitioner who notifies in good faith is protected from civil, criminal and administrative liability.

Related free cases

No account. No card.

Try twenty of these, unmarked.

A worked case shows the reasoning. A session shows you where you stand.

No account. No card.

We use cookies to enhance your experience.